METHODS
Friday, December 11th, 2009Experience Sampling
In spite of the agreement about the importance of environmental factors in anxiety, panic, and depression, we know little about the diurnal and temporal aspects of affect and anxiety, and their interaction in daily life. The ambulatory monitoring of patients is ideally suited to clarify these issues. Recent studies employing such methods have compared the shape of circadian rhythms of depressed and normal persons and demonstrated that variations in affective symptoms are universal. In these studies the difference between well and ill groups is ore a difference of degree rather than kind. In Maastricht we use the ES tech-nique, which employs random, repeated self-report measures. Developed in the for seventies and early eighties by the author and others (4,11), the ES method has today taken its place with other substantiated assessment methods in the social and psychological sciences (8,26). ES uses a "beeper" to randomly, within 90-min periods, signal subjects to fill out self-reports 10 times per day for 1 week in the context of a person’s natural environment. This method of interrupting experience provides a representative sample of a person’s mental state. In this way we have examined the temporal characteristics, situational dependence, and time budget aspects of mental state, as well as the variability and stability of symptoms over time in a number of disorders. When the beeper signals, the respondent writes down information concerning his or her momentary situation and psychological condition. This record becomes the basic data of ES. The questionnaire form is designed to take no more than a few minutes to complete. Respondents carry all the forms in booklets. The forms used in this study had the objective of seeking a comprehensive coverage of external and internal situations as well as functioning as a repeated diagnostic instrument. Items are included that assess the time at which the form is filled out, whom the subject is with, where he or she is, and what activities he or she is involved in. Nine open-ended questions assess the social and physical context as well as the content of thoughts and activities. Further assessments of mental state are made using 25 Likert-type scales based on the mental status exam and grouped in modules for evaluating thought (17), affect (18), the presence of somatic and psychological complaints, and the level of motivation. These modules have been validated by factor analysis. Added to these questions about the general properties of mental state, a pathology subsection has been added eliciting specific questions about anxiety. These questions were derived from cross-sectional diagnostic descriptions of anxiety, such as those offered by Spielberger et al. (27), DSM-III (1), and Marks and Mathews (23). Data were gathered at two levels. There were one time, cross-sectional measures gathered at the start of the study. These include illness severity ratings, diagnosis, demographic data, and other psychological assessments such as Zung and Spielberger rating scales. These diagnostic measures are in part incorporated into the Psychopathology subsection of the self-report forms. The second type of data gathered was the within-day repeated self-report measures previously described, filled in 10 times a day for 6 days. Skepticism about the application of this approach with ill persons generally arises around four central issues: (a) the adequacy of the sampling of ill persons, (b) the adequacy of the sampling of experience, (c) the experimental effects of the method, and (d) the construct validity of the self-reports. Full discussion of these methodological issues, as well as of the validity and reliability of the approach, has recently been published (5,16). Most surprisingly, compliance across sampled disordered groups, ranging from pain to schizophrenia, as well as across developmental stages, from adolescents to the elderly, has been generally high and sometimes greater than that achieved with normal controls. In order to assure the acquisition of moment-to-moment information, reports are discarded if the beep is not responded to within 10 minutes. In general, the method has validity. The time allocation questions asking who, what, or where a person is favorably match reports from larger time-budget studies (29). In studies of distinct diagnostic disorders, ES data have discriminated diagnostic groups from one another and from normals (6). Reactivity and practice effects have also proved less problematic than expected, as shown by the very small differences in split week means from the end to the beginning of the week. Further pre- and posttest differences in subject self-consciousness measures, applied to determine if psychological reactivity to the ES procedure takes place, have demonstrated negligible effects of the procedure (16). The research alliance is the key to increasing and maintaining compliance as well as the validity and reliability of the research. In this sense, ES is not a survey instrument, but a labor-intensive research method that requires the full cooperation of the subject. In summary, past research suggests that the beeper method can be used with a wide array of people and that reports can be obtained on nearly all their experience. Studies also suggest that the effects of the method on what it is measuring are minimal and that the self-reports have construct validity. Studies have further shown that it can be used with adolescents, children as young as the sixth grade, and even severely psychotic individuals. It is useful to consider the method in light of traditional paper and pencil and interview methods. It makes use of psychometric research instruments as they do, but unlike them, it does not rely on people’s ability to recollect and reconstruct their past experience. The ES method is capable of sensitively capturing mood and anxiety fluctuations over time and in different contexts in clinical populations. For example, previous studies have shown depression to co-occur with a variety of disorders when measured in daily life, such as bulimia and anorexia (7,19), and multiple personalities (22). Further, behavioral aspects of disorders have been elucidated and discussed for anxiety (12) and in schizophrenics (6,7-11). The assessment of affect by ES has correlated significantly with aspects of psychopathology, motivation, and thought while still retaining its independent factor structure. For the study reported here, this means that affect and aspects of anxiety are differ-entiable by a number of the ES variables and, therefore, the study of their interplay in daily life could be successfully explored using the ES method. We thus aim to illustrate variations in time allocation, self-report of mental states, and temporal properties of anxious and depressed subjects. (more…)